Comparison

Satsu vs Plausible

Plausible pioneered simple, privacy-first analytics and it's a great tool. Satsu shares the cookieless, no-banner philosophy but gives you much more headroom per euro, breaks out AI traffic as its own channel, and bundles SEO, accessibility and uptime — with a free tier that doesn't expire.

Why teams pick Satsu over Plausible

Far more headroom per euro

Plausible's entry plan covers roughly 10k pageviews; Satsu's €6 plan covers 500k events. Counting differs (events vs pageviews), but the headroom-per-euro gap is large — and it stays large as you grow.

A free tier that never expires

Plausible is a paid product after a trial. Satsu has a free tier with no card and no clock — start for free and stay free until you outgrow it.

AI traffic as its own channel

Plausible shows AI assistants as raw referrers. Satsu classifies ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini into a dedicated AI channel so you can actually measure them.

SEO, accessibility & uptime included

Plausible is analytics-only. Satsu audits your SEO and accessibility and monitors uptime in the same privacy-first product.

Satsu vs Plausible, side by side

Feature SatsuPlausible
Entry price€6/mo$9/mo
Volume at entry500k events10k pageviews
Free tier (not a trial)YesNo
AI-traffic channelNativeRaw referrer
SEO + accessibility auditsBuilt inNo
Uptime monitoringBuilt inNo
Cookieless · no bannerYesYes
Open-source / self-hostNoYes

Where Plausible is the better choice

No tool wins on everything. Plausible is genuinely stronger here — if these matter most to you, it may be the better fit.

  • Plausible is open-source and self-hostable — a real plus if you want to run it yourself.
  • It's a mature, well-established product with a long track record.
  • Its script is famously tiny and its UI is beautifully minimal.

The honest summary: if you want cookieless analytics with no consent banner, AI traffic as its own channel, and SEO, accessibility and uptime in one privacy-first place — with a free tier that never expires — Satsu is built for you.

  • Cookieless — no consent banner
  • AI-assistant traffic as its own channel
  • SEO, accessibility & uptime built in
  • Free tier, no card, no expiry

Frequently asked questions

Is Satsu cheaper than Plausible?

For the traffic most sites have, yes — Satsu's €6 plan covers 500k events versus roughly 10k pageviews on Plausible's entry plan, and Satsu has a free tier that never expires. Counting differs (events vs pageviews), so compare against your own volume.

Is Satsu open-source like Plausible?

No — Satsu is a hosted product, not self-hostable today. If self-hosting is a hard requirement, Plausible is the better fit; if you want more per euro plus AI traffic and site audits, Satsu is.

Are both GDPR compliant?

Yes. Both are cookieless and store no personal data, so neither needs a consent banner. Satsu is EU-hosted.

Try the Plausible alternative that does more.