Analytics Comparison
Satsu vs Google Analytics, Plausible, Fathom & Matomo
There are plenty of analytics tools out there. Some are bloated, some invasive, and some just too complex. Here's how Satsu stacks up – no fluff, just facts.
| Feature | Satsu | Google Analytics | Plausible | Fathom | Matomo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Privacy by Default | |||||
| No Cookies Required | |||||
| Lightweight Script | < 6 KB | 40-100 KB | ~ 1 KB | ~ 1.5 KB | ~ 20 KB+ |
| Real-time Dashboard | |||||
| One-line Setup | |||||
| Free Option | Currently Free | Free* | Paid Only | Paid Only | Self-hosted |
Detailed Comparison
Privacy by Default
Satsu
Fully privacy-first. No cookies, no personal data collection. GDPR and CCPA compliant out of the box.
Other Tools
Google Analytics requires consent banners and tracks extensive user data. Plausible and Fathom are also privacy-friendly, while Matomo requires manual configuration for privacy.
Consent & Cookie Banners
Satsu
Never needed – Satsu doesn't use cookies or track personal data.
Other Tools
Required for Google Analytics. Not needed for Plausible and Fathom. Matomo may require them depending on configuration.
The simple choice for developers
Satsu keeps things simple. It's fast, clean, and built for developers who want actionable insights without violating user trust.
Where others go for feature lists and complexity, Satsu focuses on clarity, privacy, and a no-nonsense developer experience.
If you're tired of GA's bloat, Matomo's complexity, or paying monthly just to track a few pages – Satsu might be exactly what you've been looking for.